CM/Notes/761/12.1... 8th Plenary Session (Strasbourg, 29-31 May 2001) - Texts adopted


Ministers' Deputies
Notes on the Agenda

CM/Notes/761/12.1 (Restricted) 6 July 2001
————————————————

761 Meeting, 18 July 2001
12 Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE)

12.1 8th Plenary Session (Strasbourg, 29-31 May 2001)
Texts adopted

 


Reference documents
 
————————————————

Action
The Deputies are invited to consider, with a view to its adoption, draft decisions appearing below. A number of draft replies to Congress Recommendations appear in the draft Decisions.


————————————————


Introduction

 

The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) took place in Strasbourg on 29-31 May 2001. It adopted fifteen Recommendations, one Opinion and sixteen Resolutions. Ten draft replies are proposed for consideration, with a view to their adoption.

 

 

Financing assured: YES

 

 

 


DRAFT DECISIONS 

 

761st meeting – 18 July 2001

 

 

Item 12.1

 

8th Plenary Session (Strasbourg, 29-31 May 2001)
Texts adopted

 

Decisions

 

The Deputies:

 

 

Concerning Recommendation 87 (2001) on local and regional democracy in Lithuania

 

1.         took note of the Recommendation, especially of paragraph 13;

 

2.         agreed to forward the Recommendation to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Lithuania;

 

3.         decided to bear the Recommendation in mind in the context of the thematic monitoring on local democracy;

 

4.         adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 87 (2001) on local and regional democracy in Lithuania. It agreed to transmit it to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Lithuania and to bear it in mind in the context of the thematic monitoring on local democracy.”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 88 (2001) on local and regional democracy in the Slovak Republic

 

5.         took note of the Recommendation, especially of paragraph 13;

 

6.         agreed to forward the Recommendation to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of the Slovak Republic;

 

7.         decided to bear the Recommendation in mind in the context of the thematic monitoring on local democracy;

 

8.         adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

           

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 88 (2001) on local and regional democracy in the Slovak Republic. It agreed to transmit it to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of the Slovak Republic and to bear it in mind in the context of its thematic monitoring on local democracy.”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 89 (2001) on local and regional democracy in Slovenia

 

9.         took note of the Recommendation;

 

10.       agreed to forward the Recommendation to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Slovenia;

 

11.       decided to bear the Recommendation in mind in the context of its thematic monitoring on local democracy;

 

12.       adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 89 (2001) on local and regional democracy in Slovenia. It agreed to transmit it to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Slovenia and to bear it in mind in the context of its thematic monitoring on local democracy”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 90 (2001) on financial relations between State, regional and local authorities in federal states – Conclusions of the Moscow International Conference (5-7 October 2000)

 

13.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

14.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments, especially the Appendix;

 

15        welcomed the International Conference as an example of the fruitful co-operation between the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe and the intergovernmental sector of the Council of Europe in the field of local democracy;

 

16.       agreed to transmit this Recommendation to the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR) for information, so that it could take account of the Final Declaration, appended to the Recommendation, in its future activities;

 

17        adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 90 (2001) on financial relations between State, regional and local authorities in federal states – Conclusions on the Moscow International Conference (5-7 October 2000). It welcomes this example of the fruitful co-operation between the Congress and the intergovernmental sector in the field of local democracy and expresses its appreciation to the Congress for having organised this Conference on such a topical issue. The Committee of Ministers has brought this Recommendation to the attention of the member Governments and has transmitted it to the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR) for information, so that it could take account of the Final Declaration, appended to the Recommendation, in its future activities.”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 91 (2001) on the Forum of cities and regions of South-East Europe – 7th Economic Forum (Skopje, 16-18 November 2000)

 

18.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

19.       agreed to bring it to the attention of their Governments;

 

20.       invited GR-EDS to consider the Recommendation, in particular paragraphs 11 a, b, d and e, with a view to preparing a draft reply; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 92 (2001) on follow-up action to be taken on the Conference “Cities and regions: cultural diversity – a precondition for a united Europe” (Innsbruck, 11-12 December 2000)

 

21.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

22.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments;

 

23.       agreed to forward this Recommendation to the European Commission, for information;

 

24.       agreed to transmit the Recommendation to the Committee of Experts of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, for information;

 

25.       agreed to transmit it to the Council for Cultural Co-operation (CDCC) and to its specialised Committees CC-ED, CC-CULT, CC-HER and CC-PAT, for information;

 

26.       invited their Rapporteur Group on Education, Culture, Youth and Sport (GR-C) to consider this Recommendation, in particular paragraph 6a, with a view to preparing a draft reply;

 

27.       encouraged their member States to continue to participate actively in the European Year of Languages 2001; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 93 (2001) on the communication and information policy of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe

 

28.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

29.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments;

 

30.       agreed to bear this Recommendation in mind when discussing the draft Budget for 2002;

 

31.       invited its Rapporteur on Information Policy to consider this Recommendation, with a view to preparing a draft reply to it;

Concerning Recommendation 94 (2001) on the conclusions of the 12th European Conference of Ministers responsible for regional planning (CEMAT) and the follow-up action to be taken (Hanover, 7-8 September 2001)

 

32.       took note of this Recommendation

 

33.       agreed to bring it to the attention of their Governments;

 

34.       agreed to transmit it to the Committee of Senior Officials of the European Conference responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) with a view to the preparation of the 13th Session;

 

35.       agreed to forward it to the European Commission, for information;

 

36.       adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered CLRAE Recommendation 94 (2001) on the conclusions of the 12th European Conference of Ministers responsible for regional planning (CEMAT) and the follow-up action to be taken (Hanover, 7-8 September 2001). It has brought it to the attention of the Governments of its member states, transmitted it to the Committee of Senior Officials of the European Conference responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) with a view to the preparation of their 13th Session, and agreed to forward it to the European Commission, for information.”;

 

Concerning Recommendation 95 (2001) on mobile telephone base stations and local/regional authorities

 

37.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

38.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments;

 

39.       adopted the following reply to this Recommendation:

 

“ The Committee of Ministers took note of Recommendation 95 (2001) of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe on mobile telephone base stations and local/regional authorities, and brought it to the attention of the Governments of its member States, for them to take it into consideration.

 

The Committee of Ministers understands CLRAE's concerns regarding possible health effects on the European population resulting from exposure to the electromagnetic fields generated by mobile telephones. However, given the clear involvement of other international organisations in this field, the Committee of Ministers does not find it judicious to introduce questions of a scientific nature, which are dealt with in other international bodies, into the Programme of Activities of the Council of Europe. ” 

 

Concerning Recommendation 96 (2001) on local democracy in Cyprus

 

40.       took note of the Recommendation, especially of paragraph 12;

 

41.       agreed to forward the Recommendation to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Cyprus;

 

42.       decided to bear the Recommendation in mind in the context of the thematic monitoring on local democracy;

 

43.       adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 96 (2001) on local democracy in Cyprus. It agreed to transmit it to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Cyprus and to bear it in mind in the context of its thematic monitoring on local democracy.”;

 

Concerning Recommendation 97 (2001) on local democracy in Ireland

 

44.       took note of the Recommendation, especially of paragraph 16;

 

45.       agreed to forward the Recommendation to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Ireland;

 

46.       decided to bear the Recommendation in mind in the context of the thematic monitoring on local democracy;

 

47.       adopted the following reply to the Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered Recommendation 97 (2001) on local democracy in Ireland. It agreed to transmit it to the governmental and parliamentary authorities of Ireland and to bear it in mind in the context of its thematic monitoring on local democracy.”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 98 (2001) on Draft World Charter on Local Self-Government – State of discussions

 

48.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

49.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments, the Parliamentary Assembly and to the States holding observer status with the Council of Europe;

 

50.       confirmed its support for the World Charter of Local Self-Government and agreed to communicate it to the representatives of their member States to the United Nations;

 

51.       adopted the following reply to this Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered CLRAE Recommendation 98 (2001) on the Draft World Charter on Local Self-Government – State of discussions. It greed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments, the Parliamentary Assembly and to the States holding observer status with the Council of Europe.

 

The Committee of Ministers has confirmed its support for the World Charter of Local Self-Government and agreed to communicate it to the representatives of their member States to the United Nations.”; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 99 (2001) on international co-operation at regional level

 

52.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

53.       agreed to bring it to the attention of their Governments;

 

54.       agreed to transmit it to the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Authorities (CDLR) for it to bear it in mind in the context of the programme of activities for 2002;

 

55.       invited its Rapporteur on Local Authorities to consider this Recommendation with a view to preparing a draft reply; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 100 (2001) on management of transboundary water resources in Europe

 

56.       took note of this Recommendation;

 

57.       agreed to bring it to the attention of their Governments;

 

58.       agreed to transmit it to the Select Committee of Experts on Transfrontier Co-operation (LR-R-CT), for information;

 

59.       invited their Rapporteur on Local Authorities to consider this Recommendation with a view to preparing a draft reply; 

 

Concerning Recommendation 101 (2001) on the impact of globalisation on regions

 

60.       took note of this Recommendation, especially of paragraphs 16.a and b;

 

61.       agreed to bring this Recommendation to the attention of their Governments;

 

62.       agreed to transmit this Recommendation to the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR) and to the Committee of Senior Officials of the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT), for information;

 

63.       agreed to forward this Recommendation to the European Committee for Social Cohesion (CDCS) for it to take it into account, especially paragraph 16.c, in its future activities;

 

64.       agreed to forward this Recommendation to the European Commission and to the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development, for information;

 

65.       adopted the following reply to this Recommendation:

 

“The Committee of Ministers has considered CLRAE Recommendation 101 (2001) on the impact of globalisation on regions, agreed to bring it to the attention of the Governments of its member States, transmitted this Recommendation to the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR), to the Committee of Senior Officials of the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) and to the European Committee for Social Cohesion (CDCS), as well as to the European Commission and to the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development, for information.

 

The Committee of Ministers is aware of the opportunities, but also challenges and threats for Europe, which are raised by the growing globalisation in all fields of life: economic, social, cultural and political. The Council of Europe is trying to respond to these challenges in, at least, social, cultural and political fields with the help of all its intergovernmental activities.

 

As for the Congress' request to speed up work to prepare a legal instrument on regional self-government, the Committee of Ministers would like to point out that the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy is, in accordance with its tersm of reference, “completing the groundwork for the elaboration of a legal instrument on regional self-government”, comprising the “drawing up of model forms of regional self-government”, the identification of “those principles which are common to all such models and which may constitute the core of a legal instrument” and the drafting of a text “which could be the core of a legal instrument, presenting these principles and models”, with the deadline of 31 December 2001. The Congress is taking an active part in the work of the Drafting Committee set up by the CDLR to assist it in completing the groundwork for the elaboration of a legal instrument on regional self-government and in carrying out the necessary drafting.

 

The Committee of Ministers will consider the CDLR report with utmost attention in 2002.

 

As for the question of studying the effects of globalisation on the social fabric of the Council of Europe member States, the Committee of Ministers would like to inform the Congress that a Forum on “New social demands and governance” will be organised in October 2001 and will deal with the following questions:

 

-           How to detect new social demands?

-           Are institutions adaptable, or do new social demands require new institutions?

-           What is the role of the private sector in terms of social demands?

-           What is the added value of cross-sectoral partnerships in a government's capacity to handle new social demands?

 

The conclusions of the Forum will result in a publication on new social demands and governance. A research project on this theme might be conducted in 2002.”; 

 

Concerning Opinion 15 (2001) on the draft Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to the member States of the Council of Europe on “Participation of citizens in local public life”

 

66.       noted that the Opinion had already been transmitted to the CDLR which took it into consideration when it finalised its preliminary draft Recommendation on the “Participation of citizens in local public life” ;

 

67.       agreed to bear it in mind when considering this draft Recommendation, with a view to its adoption;

 

Concerning Resolutions from 107 (2001) to 122 (2001)

 

68.       took note of the above-mentioned Resolutions;

 

69.       agreed to draw attention of its Steering Committee on the Mass Media (CDMM) to Resolution 122 (2001) on the “Prix Europa” and regional television and radio programmes.

 



 Top

 

  Related Documents
 
   Meetings
 
   Other documents