Strasbourg, 6 September 2011 CDLR(2011)29
Item B.1 of the agenda
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEMOCRACY
(CDLR)
OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
For adoption
Secretariat Memorandum
prepared by the Directorate General of
Democracy and Political Affairs
Directorate of Democratic Institutions
This document is public. It will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy.
Ce document est public. Il ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire.
Introduction
This document aims to give an overview of the work of the CDLR in the coming period (2010-2013), as agreed by the CDLR at its meeting in March 2011.
All work stems from the Utrecht Declaration. The result is presented in the form of the following four tables:
Table A: The CDLR contribution to the institutional initiatives agreed in the Utrecht Declaration;
Table B: The five strands of action to meet challenges identified in the Utrecht Agenda.
As Table B shows, the CDLR deals with one strand of action directly itself, whilst contributing to the four others. The activities to be undertaken by the CDLR itself are the subject of two further tables.
Table C shows the CDLR’s activities in respect of each of the challenges identified in the Utrecht Agenda. It also shows the envisaged outputs under each activity.
Table D is the most detailed one. It shows the full list of envisaged outputs and information concerning each of them.
When consulting the tables it is important to bear in mind the different levels of generality. The highest level consists of the challenges prioritised by Ministers in the Utrecht Declaration and the 5 strands of action to meet the challenges.
The strand of action of the CDLR distinguishes a number of activities and within each activity one or more outputs.
Action required
The CDLR is invited:
- to review and, making any changes it deems appropriate, to approve tables A-D, without prejudice to the right of the CDLR to revise/delete or add activities or outputs at a later stage.
Table A
The CDLR contribution to the institutional initiatives agreed in Utrecht
Activity (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapporteurs (7) |
Partners[1] (8) |
Actions to be taken (9) |
|
1 |
Reviews and joint work involving the Congress (Minister Manuel Chaves) |
Four reviews to be conducted under the Utrecht Declaration: - relationship between the intergovernmental sector and the Congress - monitoring - a possible common agenda setting - evaluation, including external evaluation. Results adopted in a Kyiv Declaration |
Functioning of co-operation between the Congress and the intergovernmental sector with a view to securing high quality outcomes and facilitating each other's work so that projects can be dealt with swiftly |
2010/I |
2011/II |
- |
Mr Enrique Ojeda, Rapporteur on behalf of Minister Chaves (Spain) Advisory Group on the Utrecht Reviews |
- Congress - PACE - Conference of INGOS - Mr Kimmo Collander (Representative of Minister Tölli) - Mr Jeremy Smith (independent expert) |
To be discussed at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
2 |
Partnership between the Ministerial Conference and the Committee of Ministers (Minister Mari Kiviniemi) |
Establishing a partnership between the Ministerial Conference and the Committee of Ministers |
Enhanced work of the Council of Europe in the field of local and regional democracy |
2010/I |
2011/II |
- |
Mr Kimmo Collander (Finland) |
To be discussed at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
|
3 |
Communication Strategy |
Active communication policy to be developed in order to maximize the impact on member States and civil society |
Enhanced work of the Council of Europe in the field of local and regional democracy |
2010/I |
2011/II |
GG IC FS |
Mrs Greta Billing (Norway) Mr Paul Rowsell (UK) |
State of implementation to be reviewed at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
|
4 |
17th Ministerial Session in Kyiv |
To adopt Kyiv Declaration and to hold “fire-side chat” |
Enhanced co-operation between Member States in the field of local and regional democracy |
2010/I |
2011/II |
GG IC FS |
Ukrainian Government and CM Chair |
Preparations to be discussed and taken forward at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
|
5 |
Frontline issues of changes |
To collect up-to-date information on the current work of Member States in the field of local and regional democracy |
Member States have insight into the current work in the filed of local and regional democracy. To provide basis for targeting future work. |
Ongoing |
Ongoing |
- |
CDLR to review and adopt Progress report at CDLR meeting in September 2011. |
Table B
Strands of action to meet the challenges identified in the Utrecht Agenda
|
||||||||||
CHALLENGES |
||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
||||
Managing the impact of the current financial/ economic crisis |
Addressing the low level of democratic participation in public life at local and regional level |
Reducing the complexity and cost of the current system of local and regional government and enhancing its efficiency |
Enhancing the capacity for and quality of governance in local and regional communities or authorities |
Addressing the impact of demographic /migration trends |
Improving access to public services delivered at local and regional level |
Making it easier for local and regional authorities to co-operate across frontiers |
||||
STRANDS OF ACTION |
||||||||||
CDLR |
Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform |
Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance at Local Level |
Co-operation and assistance programmes |
European Local Democracy Week |
||||||
Challenges addressed |
Challenges addressed |
Challenges addressed |
Challenges addressed |
Challenges addressed |
||||||
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
2, 3, 4, 6 |
2, 3, 4, 6 |
3, 4, 6 |
2, 4 |
||||||
Activities: |
Activities: |
Activities: |
Activities: |
Activities: |
||||||
a. Monitoring and responding to the financial and economic crisis b. Promoting the Additional Protocol c. Analysing participation trends d. Reducing the complexity and costs of the current system of local and regional government and enhancing its efficiency e. Strengthening Good Democratic Governance f. Exploring new challenges g. Strengthening the transfrontier co-operation |
a) Implementing capacity building programmes in members states: § Albania § Armenia § France § Georgia § Hungary § Malta § Montenegro § Russian Federation § Serbia § “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” b) Developing Toolkits c) Developing networks |
a) 1. Promoting adhesion to Strategy b) 2. Assisting member States with implementation c) 3. Developing European Label of Governance Excellence |
a) Implementing legislative and policymaking projects in member States: § Albania § Armenia § Azerbaijan § Bosnia and Herzegovina § Croatia § Georgia § Moldova § Montenegro § Serbia § Ukraine b) Regional activities § Inter-municipal co-operation |
Joint venture with the Congress § In 2008 an estimated 3000 municipalities in 25 members states organized events § In 2010 enlarged circle of “pilot cities” |
||||||
Table C
CDLR activities to meet the challenges identified in the Utrecht Agenda |
||||||
Challenges |
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Managing the impact of the current financial/economic crisis |
Addressing the low level of democratic participation in public life at local and regional level |
Reducing the complexity and cost of the current system of local and regional government and enhancing its efficiency |
Enhancing the capacity for and quality of governance in local and regional communities or authorities |
Addressing the impact of demographic /migration trends |
Improving access to public services delivered at local and regional level |
Making it easier for local and regional authorities to co-operate across frontiers |
Challenges addressed |
||||||
1, 3, 4, 6 |
2, 4, 6, |
1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
1, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
2, 3, 5, 6, 7 |
3, 4, 6, 7 |
Activity 1 |
Activity 2 |
Activity 3 |
Activity 4 |
Activity 5 |
Activity 6 |
Activity 7 |
Monitoring and responding to the financial and economic crisis |
Promoting the Additional Protocol |
Analysing participation trends |
Reducing the complexity and costs of the current system of local and regional government and enhancing its efficiency |
Strengthening Good Democratic Governance |
Exploring new challenges |
Strengthening the transfrontier co-operation |
Outputs (4) |
Outputs (2) |
Outputs (3) |
Outputs (4) |
Outputs (3) |
Outputs (3) |
Outputs (6) |
a) Report on impact of the financial and economic crisis and follow-up to guideline b) Evaluation conference c) Review report for 17th session of the Ministerial Conference d) Peer review (Iceland) |
a) Workshops to promote the Additional Protocol b) Report on the implementation of the Additional Protocol to the European Charter of Local Self-Government on the right to participate in the affairs of a local authority |
a) Report analysing the low democratic participation by certain groups in society, and taking stock of the Member States’ policies b) GG Workshop on participatory c) Report on participatory budgeting |
a) Structure and operation of local and regional government b) Reference framework of the features of the systems of local and regional government in member States c) Guidelines for funding the new competencies at local level d) Analytical tool for assessing the degree of autonomy of first-tier local authorities (Marcou tool) |
a) Report on the feasibility of Recommendation on good democratic governance b) Updated Handbook on Public Ethics c) Workshop to exchange good practices on the implementation of the Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance in pilot countries |
a) Exploratory report on the impact of demographic/migration trends b) GG Workshop on case studies of diff types of demographic impacts c) Exploratory report on improving access to public services delivered at local and regional level |
a) Appendices to Protocol 3 (2011-12) b) Review conference c) Report on the opportunities for funding the transfrontier co-operation EU/non EU d) Updating the report on the current state of dministrative and legal framework of transfrontier co-operation in member states e) Report on cross border e-services f) Workshops to promote Protocol 3 |
Summary of activities in detail appears in Table D
Table D
Draft list of activities of the CDLR for 2010 – 2013 to implement the Utrecht Agenda
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapporteurs (7) |
Partners[2] (8) |
Challenges addressed (9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
|||||||||||
Activity 1: Monitoring and responding to the financial and economic crisis |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Report on impact of the financial and economic crisis and follow-up to guidelines |
To have up-to-date information on the crisis’ impact to all member states, and to take stock on their responses. |
Member states have accurate information on the financial crisis which will facilitate their actions in responding to the financial and economic crisis. |
2010/I |
2010/II |
FS IC GG |
Mr Markku Mollari (Finland) |
LGI Budapest |
1, 3, 4, 6 |
Siobhan Montgomery / Gabriela Matei |
Activity successfully completed with Publication and dissemination of Report |
||||||||||
2 |
Review conference on the impact of and responses to the economic downturn on local government |
To exchange information and experience on how governments cope with the financial and economic crisis. |
Impact of the report is enhanced by giving the participants an opportunity for learning and exchanging. |
2010/I |
2010/II |
FS IC GG |
Mr Markku Mollari (Finland) |
LGI Budapest |
1, 3, 4, 6 |
Siobhan Montgomery / Gabriela Matei |
Activity successfully completed with Conference on 11- 12 September 2010 and a second Conference 20-21 June 2011 in Strasbourg |
||||||||||
3 |
Review report for 17th session of the Ministerial Conference |
To put forward accurate picture of the impacts of the financial and economic crisis in the member states, and to provide basis for possible further decision making. |
Ministers have increased knowledge on financial and economic crisis in the international context, and sound basis for further decision making. |
2011/I |
2011/II |
FS IC GG |
LGI Budapest |
1, 3, 4, 6 |
Siobhan Montgomery / Gabriela Matei |
Draft report and draft for Kyiv guidelines to be reviewed and approved at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
|||||||||||
4 |
Peer Review (Iseland) |
2010/I |
2010/II |
1 |
Activity successfully completed with Peer Review Report in June 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Activity 2: Promoting the Additional Protocol |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Workshops to promote the Additional Protocol |
To increase awareness of the national stakeholders on the Additional Protocol, and its policy implications. |
Additional Protocol signed, ratified and implemented by the Council of Europe member states. |
2010/I |
2013/II |
GG |
Mr. Andriy Guk (Ukraine) Mrs. Viktoria Zold-Nagy (Hungary) |
Hosting by Govern. |
2, 4, 6 |
Member States are invited to organise a workshop in co-operation with the CDLR Secretariat. One workshop was held in the Ukrainian Parliament in January 2011. |
|||||||||||
2 |
Report on the implementation of the Additional Protocol to the European Charter of Local Self-Government on the right to participate in the affairs of a local authority |
To have up-to-date information on signature and ratification of the Additional Protocol, and national experiences of its implementation. |
Ministers have accurate information and sound basis for further decision making. |
2012/I |
2013/II |
GG |
Mr. Andriy Guk (Ukraine) Mrs. Viktoria Zold-Nagy (Hungary) |
2, 4, 6 |
Tour de table to be held at CDLR meeting in September 2011 |
||||||||||||
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[4] (8) |
Challenges addressed [5](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
|||||||||||
Activity 3: Analysing participation trends |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Report analysing the low democratic participation by certain groups in society, and taking stock of the Member States’ policies |
To have insight into the low democratic participation by certain groups in society, and Member States’ policies in the areas. |
Member States have enhanced knowledge enabling them to address problems. |
2010/I |
2011/II |
GG |
Mr. Edwin Lefebre (Belgium) |
2, 3, 4, 6 |
Activity successfully completed with Report presented at the LR-GG meeting on 9 May 2011. Proposal for a workshop on low participation to be put to CDLR in September 2011. |
||||||||||||
2 |
GG Workshop on participatory budgeting |
To enable countries to exchange good practices on participatory budgeting. |
Member States have better understanding on this instrument. |
2010/I |
2011/I |
GG |
Mrs Neza Vodusek (Slovenia) |
1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
Activity successfully completed with workshop held on 10 May 2011 for both LR-GG and LR-FS members. |
||||||||||||
3 |
Report on participatory budgeting |
To have insight into the legislation and practices on participatory budgeting in the Member States. |
Member States have better understanding on this instrument and basis for possible further work. |
2011/I |
2011/II |
GG FS |
Mrs Neza Vodusek (Slovenia) Mrs Annie Biefnot Vanboterdal (Belgium) |
1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
Draft report to be put to CDLR in September 2011 |
||||||||||||
|
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[6] (8) |
Challenges addressed [7](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
|||||||||
Activity 4: Reducing the complexity and costs of the current system of local and regional government and enhancing its efficiency |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Structure and operation of local and regional government |
To have updated information on the structure and operation of local and regional government in Member States |
Member States have updated database on the structure and operation of local and regional governments |
Ongoing |
Ongoing |
To be decided at CDLR |
To be identified at CDLR |
The production of Structure and operation reports is to be integrated into the reference framework (activity 4.2 below) |
||||||||||||
2 |
Reference framework of the features of the systems of local and regional government in the member States |
To have insight into the features of the systems of local and regional government in member States. |
Member States have reference framework for purposes of comparisons which provides basis for the further work (exchange of experience and best practices). |
2010/II |
2011/I |
IC FS |
Mr Lukasz Krysztofiak (Poland) Mr Auke van der Goot (NL) Mrs Victoria Jones (UK) TBC |
1, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
Reference framework to be revised following LR-IC meeting in May 2011 and tested by volunteering member States. |
|||||||||||
3 |
Guidelines for the funding of new competencies at local level |
To offer guidelines to the member state on funding of new competencies at local level. |
Member States have guidelines on funding of new competencies at local level. |
2009/II |
2010/II |
FS |
3 |
At its meeting in March 2011 CDLR approved draft Recommendation and sent it to the CM for adoption to |
||||||||||||
4 |
Analytical tool for assessing the degree of autonomy of first-tier local authorities (Marcou tool) |
To assess the degree of autonomy of first-tier local authorities and generate quantified results allowing a comparison at European level. |
Member States have database helping the re-examination of the distribution of competences and facilitating the consideration of decentralisation issues |
2010/II |
2011/II |
3, 4, 6 |
Activity successfully completed. Revised tool (english) adopted by CDLR and published. |
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[8] (8) |
Challenges addressed [9](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
||
Activity 5: Strengthening Good Democratic Governance |
||||||||||||
1 |
Report on the feasibility of Recommendation on good democratic governance |
To explore the feasibility of the Recommendation on good democratic governance and to provide findings and recommendations. |
Member States have sound basis for decision making about possible recommendation |
2010/I |
2010/II |
GG |
Mrs. Greta Billing (Norway) |
1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
CDLR approved draft Recommendation at its meeting in March 2011 and sent it to the Committee of Ministers for adoption. |
|||
2 |
Updated Handbook on Public Ethics |
To update the Handbook on Public Ethics. |
Member States have a tool for strengthening the public ethics as a part of the Good Democratic Governance. |
2010/I |
2010/II |
GG |
Mr. Paul-Henri Philips (Belgium) |
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
Secretariat prepared summaries of replies and draft revised Handbook. Preparations for publication of updated Handbook on Public Ethics are ongoing (to be completed by end 2011). |
|||
3 |
Workshop to exchange good practices on the implementation of the Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance in pilot countries |
To enable pilot countries to exchange good practices on the implementation of the Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance. |
Pilot countries have accurate information enabling them to implement the Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance more effectively. |
2010/I |
2013/II |
GG |
Mrs. Greta Billing (Norway |
Hosting by Govern. |
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
Governments are invited to express an interest in hosting a workshop |
||
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[10] (8) |
Challenges addressed [11](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
||||||||||
Activity 6: Exploring new challenges |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Exploratory report on the impact of demographic/ migration trends |
To have insight into the impact of demographic/migra-tion trends on local and regional government, and to assess the scope for CDLR contribution. |
Member States have sound basis in decision making on possible CDLR contribution on demographic/migration trends in European countries. |
2010/II |
2011/I |
GG |
Mrs. Inga Nyholm Finland |
5 |
Activity postponed |
|||||||||||
2 |
GG Workshop on case studies of different types of demographic impacts |
To enable countries to exchange good practices. |
Member States have better understanding on this issue. |
2010/II |
2011/I |
GG |
Mrs. Inga Nyholm Finland |
5 |
Activity postponed |
|||||||||||
3 |
Exploratory report on improving access to public services delivered at local and regional level |
To explore the possibilities for improving the access to public services delivered at local and regional level. |
Member States have accurate information on the possibilities for improving the access to public services delivered at local and regional level and CDLR contribution. |
2010/I |
2010/II |
GG |
Ms. Monica Dimitriu Romania |
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
Activity postponed |
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[12] (8) |
Challenges addressed [13](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
||||||||||
Activity 7: Strengthening the transfrontier co-operation |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
Appendices to Protocol 3 (2011-12) |
To develop domestic legislation that enables full implementation of Protocol 3. |
Members states have drafts that could facilitate the adoption of the relevant domestic legislation. |
2010/I |
2011/II |
IC |
7 |
Following discussion at LR-IC meeting in May 2011, guidelines adopted for consultants work (first reading in 2012). |
||||||||||||
2 |
Review Conference |
To exchange information on how to reduce/remove obstacles to crossborder co-operation. |
Members states have increased capacity to strengthen transfrontier co-operation. |
2010/I |
2011/II |
IC |
Spain, Netherlands |
7 |
Questionnaire issued and replies collated and analysed. Consultation to be held on 12 September on proposal for a draft declaration on obstacles (for Kyiv Declaration). |
|||||||||||
3 |
Report on the opportunities for funding the transfrontier co-operation EU/non EU funds |
To research and identify the opportunities for funding the transfrontier co-operation EU/non EU funds. |
Members states have further insight as to which sources of funding transfrontier co-operation exist for them and local/regional authorities to use. |
2010/I |
2011/II |
IC |
7 |
LR-IC to discuss terms of reference for consultant (in 2012) |
Output (1) |
Objective (2) |
Expected impact (3) |
Start date (4) |
End-date (5) |
Sub-Com. (6) |
Rapport. (7) |
Partners[14] (8) |
Challenges addressed [15](9) |
Communica-tion plans of action (10) |
Overview: state of progress per date (11) |
||||||||||
4 |
Updating the report on the current state of administrative and legal framework of transfrontier co-operation in member states |
To have an updated version of the report on the current state of administrative and legal framework of transfrontier co-operation in member states. |
Member States have clearer picture of the current state of administrative and legal framework of transfrontier co-operation. |
2011/I |
2011/II |
IC |
7 |
To be circulated for updating in early 2012 |
||||||||||||
5 |
Report on cross border e-services |
To have an oversight of cross border e-services across Europe. |
Members states’ information base is enhanced so that they can take appropriate action in order to develop cross border e-services. |
2011/I |
2011/II |
IC |
3,4,6,7 |
To be postponed or abandoned |
||||||||||||
6 |
Workshops to promote Protocol 3 |
To increase awareness of the national stakeholders on the Protocol 3. |
Protocol 3 signed, ratified and implemented by the Council of Europe member states. |
2011/I |
2013/II |
IC |
Hosting by Govern. |
7 |
Governments express interest in hosting an event |
Challenges
1: Managing the impact of the current financial/economic crisis
2: Addressing the low level of democratic participation in public life at local and
regional level
3: Reducing the complexity and cost of the current system of local and regional
government and enhancing its efficiency
4: Enhancing the capacity for and quality of governance in local and regional
communities or authorities
5: Addressing the impact of demographic/migration trends
6: Improving access to public services delivered at local and regional level
7: Making it easier for local and regional authorities to co-operate across frontiers
[1] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[2] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[3] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[4] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[5] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[6] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[7] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[8] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[9] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[10] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[11] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[12] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[13] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.
[14] In all cases those identified in the terms of reference of the CDLR as participants, other participants and observers are invited to contribute.
[15] At Utrecht Ministers voted to establish the priority to be given to the challenges the CDLR had identified in the field of local and regional democracy. Challenges are listed at the last page of this document.