Strasbourg, 11 September 2009
CDLR(2009)35 Addendum I
Item 6.3 of the agenda
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEMOCRACY
(CDLR)
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDAPEST AGENDA
BY MEMBER STATES
Frontline Issues of Change
Secretariat Memorandum
prepared by the Directorate General of
Democracy and Political Affairs
Directorate of Democratic Institutions
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
4 |
Budapest-Challenge I Giving full effect to the principle of subsidiarity by defining and legislating on the competences, structures and boundaries of local and regional authorities |
4 |
Budapest-Challenge II Fostering effective relations between different levels of territorial administration, particularly between central and local authorities |
8 |
Budapest-Challenge III Encouraging and creating the necessary conditions for intermunicipal co-operation |
9 |
New challenges |
9 |
B. Democratic Participation and Public Ethics |
10 |
Budapest-Challenge I Responding to the changing ways in which citizens engage in public life at local level and, in some cases, the decreasing willingness to do so. |
10 |
Budapest-Challenge II Ensuring ethical behaviour by local and regional authorities, elected representatives and officials, whilst respecting local and regional self-government as well as individual rights and legitimate interests. |
11 |
Budapest-Challenge III Addressing the low level of electoral turnout in elections at local and regional level in many countries. |
12 |
Budapest-Challenge IV Broadening the scope for participation by foreign residents in public life at local level. |
13 |
New challenges |
13 |
C. Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
14 |
Budapest-Challenge I-IV § Reaching a level of resources for local and regional authorities which is commensurate with their responsibilities § Finding an optimum structure of income sources in order to allow local and regional authorities to offer their citizens services which are adapted to their requirements § Fostering the leadership and capacity of local and regional authorities to deliver good local and regional governance and providing citizens with services of the highest possible quality while respecting budgetary constraints § Striking the right balance between a high degree of freedom for local and regional authorities in managing their finance and a high degree of accountability |
14 |
New challenges |
18 |
D. Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
19 |
Budapest-Challenge I Finding ways and means of providing territorial communities or authorities and their transfrontier co-operation bodies with the capacity necessary to engage in and develop co-operation |
19 |
Budapest-Challenge II Removing remaining legal and administrative obstacles to Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
19 |
Budapest-Challenge III Establishing a clear and effective legal framework for institutionalised co-operation between territorial communities or authorities (euro-regions) |
21 |
General challenge of transnational or transregional co-operation Summary table |
23 24 |
Legend Heading Political importance/ Technical complexity PI – Political Importance 1 – very high 3 – medium TC – Technical Complexity 2 – high 4 – low ILA – Involvement of Local and Regional Authorities Time frame – Period specified for the issue addressed ns – not specified |
I.1. |
General and comprehensive reforms to advance decentralisation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Comprehensive reform of Decentralisation Municipalities given taxation power (2007); Law on the procedure of exercising municipal fiscal power (2008); Development towards strengthened local democracy and towards strengthened co-operation among the sub-national levels (Regional Development Act 2008); Upgrading of regulatory framework of local self-government. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - 2009 |
Czech Republic |
Draft Act on Territorial and Administrative Set-up of the State Harmonisation of all self-government and state administration units such as courts, police, labour offices. |
2 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2011 |
Netherlands |
Agreements with local and provincial authorities Vigorous efforts to decentralise tasks and powers to provinces and municipalities with the aim of increasing their autonomy. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2007- 2011 |
Norway |
Redistribution of tasks and responsibilities from central to regional level White Paper and Green paper on the decentralisation of responsibilities to regional level. |
2 |
- |
- |
2008 - 2010 |
Portugal |
Decentralisation of competences in the field of education Continuation of the process of transferring powers from central to local level, specifically with regard to: basic education pre-school education and non-educative questions such as school meals, after-school activities, or social issues. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – 2010 |
Slovenia |
Establishment of regions with competences Act on Regions, Act on the establishing of regions, Act on the competences of regions. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 -2011 |
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
Budapest-Challenge I (continued) Giving full effect to the principle of subsidiarity by defining and legislating on the competences, structures and boundaries of local and regional authorities. |
I.2. |
Modernisation of local and regional administration and service delivery |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Hungary |
Deregulation and supervision efforts To increase the quality of services. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2010 |
Italy |
New code for local authorities More efficient and effective organisation of local government. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
ns - 2011 |
Portugal |
Extension of the programme Simplex To modernise and simplify the services of local and regional authorities. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 - 2009 |
Romania |
Drafting of the Code of Administrative procedures1 and of the Romanian Administrative Code2 Creation of coherent and unitary legal provisions to be implemented by central and local governments; Simplification of the means of action to ensure predictability of the rules; To ensure stability of the legal framework. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
7/2007 – End 20091 3/2008 - 20102 |
Slovakia |
Preparation of a Municipal reform Modernisation through introduction of IT and increasing the efficiency of processes within local self-government. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2/2007 – 6/2009 |
Turkey |
Drafting of legal documents to strengthen local and regional authorities To increase the service delivery by local and regional authorities. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2003 - 2010 |
I.3. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Municipal reform – reform on legal establishment of cities and villages |
||||
ILA |
Time frame |
||||
Hungary |
Merger of administrative tasks for several villages Development and extension of notary districts carrying out administrative tasks for several villages to increase efficiency in terms of quality and economy of administration while ensuring adequate representation. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2010 |
Stricter conditions for splitting of municipalities To limit the number of villages or the creation of new villages. |
|||||
Strengthening the status of the mayor Villages require a population of at least 500 inhabitants to be granted a full-time mayor. The measure aims at limiting the expenditure at municipal level. |
|||||
Slovakia |
Amendment of the legislation on municipal establishment Amendment of the Act No. 369/1990 on municipal establishment and resolution of obstacles in its implementation. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 – end 2009 |
Turkey |
Legislation on settlement and merging of small municipalities Increase efficiency in economical and qualitative terms. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2003 - 2010 |
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
Budapest-Challenge I (continued) Giving full effect to the principle of subsidiarity by defining and legislating on the competences, structures and boundaries of local and regional authorities. |
I.4. |
Reform and restructuring on local level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Armenia |
Enhancing the co-operation of municipal institutions within the municipalities Strengthening co-operation between the Municipal Council, the Mayor and an Council Institute in accordance with European standards. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 - 2012 |
Azerbaijan |
Comprehensive strengthening and restructuring of municipalities. |
- |
- |
Yes |
2008 – 2010 |
Estonia |
Reforming local government units To balance disparities between territorial areas and to foster economic stability. |
1 |
1 |
yes |
2008 - 2013 |
Creation of big city municipalities; |
2 |
3 |
|||
Improvement of supervision mechanisms; |
3 |
3 |
|||
Improvement of the legal basis; |
2 |
3 |
|||
Consolidation of small municipalities in their ability to solve social problems; |
2 |
4 |
|||
Enlargement of municipality institutions. |
2 |
3 |
9/2008 – end 2009 |
||
Finland |
Reform on reshaping the municipal structure and on strengthening the organisation of basic service delivery Encouraging the merging of municipalities; Diversifying the scale of municipal co-operation to ensure equal and good municipal service delivery. |
1 |
3 |
Yes |
2004 - 2012 |
Georgia |
Reform of the local institutional structure Improved institutional set-up at local level. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2006 - 2010 |
Latvia |
Reorganisation of the local and regional structure creation of 109 local governments and abolition of 26 regional governments. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
1992 – finished (7/09) |
Lithuania |
New wording of the law on Local Self Government Restructuring of municipalities, extension of competences and participation, change of procedures |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2007 - 2008 |
Luxembourg |
Territorial reorganisation and administrative reform Reduction in the number of local authorities; reorganisation of intermunicipal co-operation; appropriate definition of relations with central level. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2004- 2017 |
Malta |
Legislative reforms concerning terms of office, elections and representation To strengthen local democracy with increased citizens’ participation. |
1 |
3 |
Yes |
5/2008 – end 2009 |
Spain |
Draft of a basic law on local government and administration Reforming the existing legal framework for local entities towards a strengthened role of the local level. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2005 - 2010 |
Switzerland |
Fusion of local government units within Cantons To increase economic efficiency and to facilitate collaboration. |
2 |
2 |
- |
ns - 2010 |
United Kingdom |
Initiative for voluntary restructuring of local authorities in two-tier areas Reduction of 44 English local authorities in two-tier areas to 9 unitary authorities to improve the delivery of local services in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and integration. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – 4/2009 |
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
Budapest-Challenge I (continued) Giving full effect to the principle of subsidiarity by defining and legislating on the competences, structures and boundaries of local and regional authorities. |
I.5. |
Reform at regional level |
||||
ILA |
Time frame |
||||
Albania |
Clarification of regional competences Clarification of the function and competences of the Council of Regions. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2003 - ns |
Finland |
Reform on merging regional authorities Decrease number of regional state authorities from six to two. |
1 |
3 |
yes |
2007 - 2010 |
Spain |
Reforming the Statutes of Autonomy of the Regions Better delimitation of the competences of the Regions, strengthened participation of the regions in the central decision making process. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - open |
Sweden |
Reform of merging regional administrations Merging of the County Councils, leading to the new regions. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2003 - 2014 |
I.6. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Elections and legitimacy |
||||
ILA |
Time frame |
||||
Lithuania |
Direct election of mayors |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
ns - 2009 |
Serbia |
Changes to the legal framework for local elections Adoption of the draft law on election at local level; Adoption of the draft law on State Election Commission; Adoption of the draft law on political parties; Adoption of the draft law on the electoral list. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
10/2008 – 9/2009 |
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
II.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Central and Local Level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Comprehensive measures to strengthen the links and relationship between local and central level. Improving institutional dialogue; Setting up information centres and coordination mechanisms to improve the links between de-concentrated territorial units of the executive authority and municipalities; Optimisation of competences for coordination of politics. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - 2009 |
II.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Central and Regional Level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Spain |
Establishment of appropriate institutions enabling co-operation between the State and the regions Setting up of bilateral commissions for co-operation between the state and newly upgraded regions. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - open |
II.3. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Relation Local and Regional Level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Belgium (Flemish Region) |
New decree on municipalities and adjustment of the new decree on provinces More conformity between legislation on municipalities and provinces. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2007 - 2009 |
Finland |
Kainuu experiment: model for organising the local and regional government within one region Increased productivity, ensured service delivery. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2002 - 2012 |
Netherlands |
Review of the framework for co-operation at local and regional level, allowing for co-operation on public law basis Review of the Joint Arrangements Act (Co-operation of local and regional authorities act) to clarify the legal framework for co-operation. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – finished (end 2007) |
Strengthening co-operation of local and regional authorities on private law basis Abolition of the legal requirement of prior approval for co-operation on private law basis. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2006 – finished (end 2007) |
II.4. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Interregional level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Switzerland |
Increase legitimacy of interregional government co-operation Participation of regional parliaments in the intergovernmental co-operation between regional governments. |
2 |
2 |
No |
ns - 2010 |
A. Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
Budapest-Challenge III Encouraging and creating the necessary conditions for intermunicipal co-operation. |
III.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Strengthening intermunicipal co-operation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Promotion and creation of the necessary conditions for intermunicipal co-operation Legislative strengthening of municipal co-operation; Access to EU funds; Upgrading the regulatory framework for public-private partnership. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - ongoing |
France |
Legislative reform to strengthen intermunicipal co-operation Increased intermunicipal co-operation and a clear defintion of the different levels of intervention of state authorities. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 - ns |
IV.1 |
Frontline Issue of Change: Working conditions |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Denmark |
Working conditions of politicians at local level Establishment of a working group to examine the current situation, concrete objectives still to be agreed upon. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
Fall 2008 - 2010 |
Serbia |
Adoption of a draft law on the communal police. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
10/2008 – 9/2009 |
|
||||||
I.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Increasing citizen’s participation in the decision making process on local level |
|||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
|
Armenia |
Enhancement of the role of the Municipal Council Improving public participation at local self-government level. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 - 2012 |
|
Austria |
Strengthening citizens’ involvement in local & regional government Increasing participation of citizens in the work of the government. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
ns – open |
|
Belgium (Brussels) |
Utilization of international tools, initiatives and Strategies Support to the European Local Democracy Week; Support to use of the CLEAR instrument for diagnosing local participation; Implementation of the principles of the Strategy on Innovation and Good Governance at local level. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2007 – open |
|
Bulgaria |
Creation of conditions for citizens’ participation in the process of policy formulation and decision-making on local level Amendment of current law on Local Self-government, Local Administration and the Regional Development Act; Enhancing forms of direct democracy; Development of consultation mechanisms. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – open |
|
Czech Republic |
Strengthening citizens’ participation in the decision-making process. |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2000 - 2006 |
|
Denmark |
Assessment of tools and methods of municipalities to encourage local democracy and assessment of best practices Publication of two studies, based on a recommendation of 2005 of the Committee on democratic participation at local level and headed by the Ministry of Social Welfare. Expected to be published in spring 2009. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2005 - 2009 |
|
Estonia |
Strengthening contacts between NGOs and local authorities. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 -2010 |
|
Awareness raising among leaders of local authorities about their role as promoter of active participation. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 – 2010 |
||
France |
To involve citizens in the designating process of executive bodies for intercommunal co-operation To extend participation and increase control mechanisms through the integration of associations on the local decision-making process. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 - ns |
|
Lithuania |
Programme for financial support to local communities to strengthen citizens’ involvement The programme aims to motivate the residents to participate more actively in the municipalities’ decision-making process and provides financial means for structural dialogue. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - finished |
|
Norway |
Creation of new political initiatives White paper on local democracy. |
2 |
- |
Yes |
2006 – finished 3/2009) |
|
Portugal |
Achieving a more effective local democracy with strengthened monitoring powers for the Assembly of the Municipalities. |
2 |
1 |
Yes |
2007 - 2009 |
|
Slovenia |
Finding new ways of participation at local level |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
In progress |
|
Sweden |
“Citizen Dialogue” project Spreading of best practices . |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2006 - ns |
|
United Kingdom |
The Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill The devolution of more power to local communities and the provision of greater involvement of local authorities in local and regional economic development will also strengthen the citizens’ involvement at local level. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
3/2008 – 7/2009 |
|
B. Democratic Participation and Public Ethics |
||||||
Budapest-Challenge I (continued) Responding to the changing ways in which citizens engage in public life at local level and, in some cases, the decreasing willingness to do so. |
||||||
I.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: New approaches to increase electoral participation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Latvia |
Preparation of a Law on referendums of local governments |
4 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 – 9/2009 |
Lithuania |
Amendment of the Law on Elections to Local Government Council Gives citizens the possibility to nominate themselves as candidates for the Local Government Council. The requirement to be nominated by a party is abolished. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - 2009 |
Netherlands |
Revision of e-voting systems To achieve more transparency in the e-voting process. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
1998 - ongoing |
Project to vote with a voter’s pass at any polling station in their own municipality About 80% of all Dutch municipalities took part in the past. |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2005 - ongoing |
II.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Fight against corruption |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Azerbaijan |
Increasing transparency about the municipalities’ measures to fight corruption To increase the participation in local politics (rise of legitimacy) and to prevent corruption creating conditions. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
7/2007 - 2011 |
Increasing the revenue from the use of land owned by municipalities Increasing financial resources of municipalities. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
10/2007 -2010 |
|
Bulgaria |
Follow-up measures to improve the fight against corruption Adoption and implementation of the Law for Prevention and Disclosure of Conflict of Interests served as a basis for regulations and institutional frameworks to fight corruption. |
2 |
2 |
yes |
2006 – cont. |
Czech Republic |
Ethics at local and regional level Tackling the issue aims at the the creation of higher standards in service delivery and at fighting corruption. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2004 - 2010 |
B. Democratic Participation and Public Ethics |
Budapest-Challenge II (continued) Ensuring ethical behaviour by local and regional authorities, elected representatives and officials, whilst respecting local and regional self-government as well as individual rights and legitimate interests. |
II.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Creation and strengthening of Codes of Ethics |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Hungary |
Creation of the Civil Servant Ethic Code Setting stricter rules for ethical behaviour and fostering more efficient carrying out of tasks. |
2 |
2 |
- |
2007 – open |
Malta |
Amendment of the Code of Ethics for Local Councillors Inclusion of more stringent provisions. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
5/2008 – end 2009 |
Norway |
New legislation on issues of ethical importance for municipalities and county authorities Strengthening the importance of ethical conduct. |
2 |
- |
Yes |
2007 - 2009 |
Romania |
Institutional strengthening of the role of ethical councillors |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 - 2009 |
Spain |
Reinforced requirements on transparency and public ethics of local representatives and civil servants Measures are part of the draft project on local government and administration. |
1 |
1 |
yes |
2005 - 2010 |
Turkey |
Identifying problems of public ethics and determining principles for the establishment of rules Research Project Planning Practices in Local and Regional Governments and Ethics, part of a project on the prevention of corruption. |
2 |
3 |
yes |
2008 - 2010 |
III.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Electoral turnout |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Austria |
Strengthening the involvement of citizens at local and regional level Increasing participation of citizens in elections. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
ns – open |
Belgium (Flemish Region) |
Assessing the use of new technologies and the simplification of electoral legislation Based on the evaluation of elections for municipal and provincial councils, the assessment aims at increasing the electoral turnout. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2009 - 2011 |
Czech Republic |
Strengthening participation of citizens in local elections |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2000 - 2010 |
B. Democratic Participation and Public Ethics |
Broadening the scope for participation by foreign residents in public life at local level. |
IV.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Legal reform to allow foreign residents participation at local level |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Creation of legal regulations for EU citizens on voting and standing as candidates in local elections Amendment of the Law on Local Elections and approval of the Law on Election of Members of the European Parliament from the Republic of Bulgaria. |
2 |
2 |
yes |
2006 – finished (2007) |
Czech Republic |
Ratification of CETS 144 |
3 |
3 |
yes |
2006 - 2010 |
Lithuania |
Convention on the Participation of Foreigners in Public Life at Local Level (CETS 144) Signed in February 2008, expected to be ratified by the Parliament in 2009/2010. |
2 |
2 |
- |
2/2008 - 2010 |
Luxembourg |
Modification of the electoral law Simplification of procedures and inscription for foreigners. |
- |
- |
- |
ns – finished (12/2008) |
V.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Gender and tolerance |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Norway |
Project Show window for women in local government Objective: 50% of women in local politics. |
2 |
- |
Yes |
2007 - 2011 |
Sweden |
Inclusion, Exclusion and Radicalisation Strengthening social cohesion, tolerance and respect in deprived areas at local level and prevention of religious radicalisation. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 – 2011 |
I-IV.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Financial decentralisation and deconcentration |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Albania |
Local Financial Law Preparation of a draft law on local budget procedures, mechanisms of budget allocation at local level, internal audit and control systems. A first draft has been prepared. |
- |
- |
Yes |
ns - 2010 |
Bulgaria |
Increasing financial resources on and administrative powers on local level Development of financial decentralisation; increase in the total equalisation subsidy; strengthening the capacity of local budgets for financing expenditure; increase to the Real Estate Property Tax; capacity building measures, strengthened administrative powers for delegated services and their financing; development of public-private partnership; Amendment to the Law of Concessions, Public Education and others. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - open |
Czech Republic |
Reform of fiscal deconcentration Budgetary allocation of taxes for territorial self-governing units. |
2 |
1 |
yes |
2009 - 2012 |
Hungary |
Central budgetary support system reconstructed to bring it line with the supervision of tasks and duties. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 -2010 |
Italy |
Fiscal Federalism To create more accountability in the use of financial resources. |
2 |
1 |
Yes |
ns – 2009 |
Portugal |
Establishing a legal framework defining the financial competences of municipalities. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2009 |
Slovenia |
Act on Financing of Regions As a part of the regional reform, the acts lay down the basis for the establishment of regions. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2011 |
Spain |
Reform of the regional and local financing system To increase the financial resources and the economic responsibility of regional and local authorities. Participation of the three vice-presidents of the government in this process. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2010 |
Turkey |
Increased revenue to local and regional authorities. |
2 |
1 |
yes |
2003 - finished |
United Kingdom |
The Local Democracy Economic Development and Construction Bill Provisions to provide for greater involvement of local authorities in local and regional development to enable them to take action to boost jobs and skills and support businesses. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
3/2008 – 7/2009 |
C. Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
Budapest-Challenge I-IV (continued) |
I-IV.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: New financial instruments and non-fiscal sources of revenue |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Azerbaijan |
Increase of financial sources of the local budget The use of local resources to strengthen municipal ownership and financial independence. |
3 |
4 |
Yes |
9/2008 - 2010 |
Belgium (Flemish Region) |
Elaboration of a new set of financial instrument for municipalities. |
2 |
2 |
X |
ns |
Bulgaria |
Increase possibilities of local authorities to develop proper financial sources Upgrading of the regulatory framework of local authorities to determine independently the level of local charges and other non-fiscal sources of revenue. Granting municipalities certain taxation authority, incl. revenue from new conceded taxes (2007-2009). |
2 |
2 |
X |
2006 - open |
France |
Fiscal reform on local level Clarification of financing mechanisms for local authorities; compensation for the abolition of the trade tax. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 – ns |
Georgia |
Regional Development To dispose of financing mechanisms to boost regional development. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2009 - 2011 |
Norway |
Green Paper on a General Purpose Grant Scheme The new scheme is expected for 2010. |
2 |
- |
X |
2006 - 2009 |
Serbia |
Draft law on public Property, Ownership and other Property Rights of the Republic of Serbia, Autonomous Province and Local Self-Governing Units Solving problems of local finance. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
9/2008 – 12/2009 |
I-IV.3. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Equalisation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Austria |
Task-oriented community financing |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 – open |
Denmark |
Evaluation of socioeconomic criteria in theequalisation and the block grant scheme To increase the information available on the socio-economic situation in order to adjust the equalisation and the block grant scheme and to facilitate estimating the expenditure needs of local authorities. |
2 |
1 |
yes |
2007 – mid 2009 |
Georgia |
Local equalisation policy Increased feasibility for more efficient equalisation. |
4 |
1 |
yes |
2009 - 2011 |
Latvia |
Preparation of amendments on the law on financial equalisation of local governments To be adopted by 1st of June 2009. |
1 |
1 |
yes |
2008 – 6/2009 |
Luxembourg |
Reform of local finances Equalisation between communities, strengthened financial basis. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 - 2012 |
Malta |
Amendment of procurement regulations Ensure equity and speedy redress. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
5/2008 – end 2009 |
Sweden |
Committee on the revision of the equalisation system for local governments The Committee is elaborating proposals for changes. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
1/2009 – 4/2011 |
C. Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
Budapest-Challenge I-IV (continued) |
I-IV.4. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Reforms on financing and service delivery |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Armenia |
Increasing local authority budgets and improving service delivery Improvement of financial equalisation mechanism, improvement of new types of local taxes; enlargement of local authorities; creation of intermunicipal unions. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 – 2012 |
Finland |
Revision of the local government finance and state grant system. The new system shall ensure equal and efficient services to all citizens while keeping taxes and fees at a moderate level. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2003 2010 |
Switzerland |
General attempts towards more effectiveness, efficiency, economic stimulus and a reduction in the discrepancy in tax issues between cantons. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
ns |
I-IV.5. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Other reforms |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Serbia |
Intergovernmental Commission on the law of local finances Improvement of the working methodology of the Commission aims at contributing to the resolution of problems of local finance. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
9/2008 -12/2009 |
I-IV.6. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Reforming financing mechanisms |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Reforming the mechanisms for transfering budetary allocations from central to municipal level. Introduction and wider spread use of the system of delegated budgets in the educational system and in some other sectors. Setting and upgrading minimum standards for delegated activities in municipalities and upgrading mechanisms applied to public information and used for transparency as regards the funding required for such activities and services. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - 2009 |
I-IV.7. |
Frontline Issue of Change: E-government |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Czech Republic |
Assessing e-government solutions at local and regional level Simplification of public services process; increase in the quality of service delivery; development of a network of one-stop-shops; introduction of data boxes for communication. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 – 2014 |
Estonia |
Strategy of local government information society 2008 – 2011 Enforcement of the digital registration and administration system; Increase in compatibility of public sector databases and document exchange systems; unified web pages for local governments to increase user friendliness. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2011 |
C. Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
Budapest-Challenge I-IV (continued) |
I-IV.8. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Extension of services |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Azerbaijan |
Delivery of social services Expansion of service delivery to social issues. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
9/2008 - 2010 |
I-IV.9. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Quality standards and efficiency |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Hungary |
Strengthened sub-national co-operation Establishment of an operational basis for strengthened co-operation between micro regions. |
1 |
1 |
yes |
2006-2010 |
Italy |
Local public utilities A more efficient organisation of local public utilities. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
ns - 2009 |
Turkey |
Determination of national standards on specific services To increase quality, productivity and effectiveness of local public services in selected subjects. |
2 |
1 |
yes |
2009 - 2013 |
Slovakia |
Strengthening the efficiency of public service provisions As a part of the Municipal Reform, the objective is effective and optimal service delivery while decreasing the costs without a negative effect on quality. Handed to the Government of the Slovak Republic in June 2009. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2/2007 – 6/2009 |
I-IV.10. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Auditing |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Hungary |
Supervision of the financial control system Creation of greater transparency and stricter financial discipline. |
1 |
1 |
yes |
2006-2010 |
Netherlands |
New auditing rules To increase transparency for local authorities. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
1998 – impl. |
Sweden |
Reform of the auditing rules for municipalities Reformed laws increase the autonomy of municipalities in auditing. |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2008 - 2011 |
I-IV.11. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Accountancy |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Malta |
Amendments to existing financial and procurement regulations Ensuring accountability and transparency. |
1 |
2 |
Yes |
5/2008 – end 2009 |
Netherlands |
New budgeting and accounting rules (dualisation) To increase transparency for local authorities. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
1999 – impl. |
I-IV.12. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Defining the scope for action |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Romania |
Local Public Financial Code To complete and improve the legal framework for financial activities of local governments. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 – 2009 |
Norway |
Regulations on financial management on local level Clarification of the ability of local authorities to take risks. |
2 |
- |
- |
2007 - 2009 |
C. Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
V.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Responding to the economic crisis and other emergencies |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Estonia |
Economic stimulus package for local governments State budget allocation of the central government to stabilize local governments in economic difficulties to avoid further aggravation of the financial situation. The package entails steady monitoring of the Ministry of Finance and consultation mechanisms with local governments during financial difficulties. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2009 - 2011 |
Romania |
Law on the financial crisis and the bankruptcy within administrative-territorial units The law will be the first legal instrument to regulate the financial crisis and cases of bankruptcy within administrative-territorial units. The law is to be forwarded to the Parliament for approval in the second quarter of 2009. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 – open |
United Kingdom |
Measures to face difficulties as a result of the financial crisis The introduction of a regulation to allow authorities to delay accounting until 2010-11; Funding of sector-led expertise for a number of local authorities. Setting up a national and regional economic council; A review of the guidance which central government publishes on local authority investments; Consideration is being given to how central government might help local authorities deal with the effects of the downturn, for example, in maintaining levels of capital spending. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
Autumn 2008 - ongoing |
Portugal |
Creation of a Municipal Emergency Fund The fund aims at ensuring the financial means for the delivery of services in times of turbulence or catastrophy. |
1 |
1 |
- |
2009 |
I.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Capacity Building on EU funding opportunities |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Funding identification and capacity building to access the funding opportunities, to network and to develop transfrontier co-operation The objective is to develop co-operation within the eligible frameworks: The European Regional Development Fund (EU internal co-operation programme, external co-operation programme, programme for the Black Sea Basin, programme for trans-national co-operation in the South East European Space, INTERREG IVC, INTERACT II, ESPON 2013, URBACT II), facilitated through the organisation of seminars for capacity building of administration on transfrontier co-operation and project development and through network activities. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – open |
II.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Agreements and treaties with third countries |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Bulgaria |
Dismantling certain legal and administrative barriers to Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation 1. Treaties and agreements for cross-border co-operation with neighbouring countries to facilitate economic co-operation 2. Organisation of bilateral, international and regional seminars and business meetings to develop cross-border co-operation. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 –open |
Malta |
Strengthening ties with European municipalities through enhanced co-operation arrangements . |
2 |
2 |
yes |
5/2008 - ongoing |
Portugal |
Reinforcing transfrontier co-operation with Spain Relevant areas of co-operation include strengthening competitiveness and employment promotion, environment, heritage, risk prevention, land-use planning and socio-economic and institutional issues. The objective is to overcome legal and other obstacles to promote the development of the Spanish-Portuguese border regions by strengthening existing economic relations and co-operation areas. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - 2013 |
Slovenia |
Bilateral transfrontier and interterritorial agreements in progress Ratification to be expected in the near future. |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
2002 - 2010 |
D. Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
Budapest-Challenge II (continued) Removing remaining legal and administrative obstacles to Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation. |
II.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Reform of national legislation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Czech Republic |
Simplification of possibilities for transfrontier co-operation in the light of EU legislation and regional policy initiatives To reach a higher level of participation of self-governing units in transfrontier co-operation. |
4 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - 2010 |
Romania |
Legal provision allowing transfrontier co-operation The new provision of the Law 215/2001 on local public administration allows local public authorities to set up associations of intermunicipal development with territorial and administrative units from abroad and to develop transfrontier and interterritorial projects. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - finished |
Switzerland |
Implementation of the new law on regional policy aiming at achieving better economic equilibrium between regions Transfrontier, transnational and interregional co-operation is expected to favour programmes and projects which aim at stimulating innovation and competitiveness of the regions. That includes objective 3 under the cohesion policy of the EU. |
1 |
1 |
Yes |
2008 - 2013 |
II.3. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Participation under the structural funds of the EU |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Estonia |
Implementation of objective 3 of the EU’s Structural Funds 8 programmes are being carried out to increase territorial cohesion and co-operation with neighbouring countries, diminishing the socio-economic disparities in border areas. |
2 |
3 |
Yes |
2005 - 2013 |
Bulgaria |
Development of co-operation under objective 3 of the EU structural Funds Among the areas addressed are: urban – rural areas; access to basic infrastructure; promotion of joint use of infrastructure facilities; development of institutional and administrative capacities. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - open |
II.4. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Others |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Georgia |
Cross-border co-operation instruments To develop proper cross-border co-operation mechanisms. |
4 |
2 |
Yes |
2009 - 2011 |
D. Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
III.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Euroregions and the Madrid Outline Convention |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Armenia |
Euroregion co-operation model Attempts to co-operate within the Euroregion model and – in this way – to benefit from EU structural funds. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2008 - 2009 |
Belgium (Flemish region) |
Draft third protocol to the Madrid Outline Convention on Euroregional Co-operation Groupings Working towards a not too detailed legal instrument. |
4 |
3 |
yes |
x ns |
Hungary |
Ratification process of the Additional and Second Additional Protocol to the European Outline Convention on transfrontier co-operation between territorial communities or authorities To provide a wider legal framework for transfrontier co-operation. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
3/2009 – end 2009 |
Spain |
Compatibility of the European Outline Convention of Madrid and EGTC Searching for compatible actions carried out under both frameworks in order to strengthen the consistency of territorial co-operation across Europe. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - open |
III.2. |
Frontline Issue of Change: The Benelux Convention |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Belgium – Flemish Region |
The Benelux Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation The convention is to be updated to create an efficient and suitable legal instrument which facilitates transfrontier co-operation for local and other authorities. |
2 |
2 |
- |
2009 |
Netherlands |
Update of the Benelux Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation Process of considering whether to update the Convention was expected to be finished in 2008. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - 2008 |
D. Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
Budapest-Challenge III (continued) Establishing a clear and effective legal framework for institutionalised co-operation between territorial communities or authorities (Euro-regions). |
III.3. |
Frontline Issue of Change: European Groupings on Territorial Co-operation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Belgium (Flemish Region) |
Follow-up of established EGTC 1. The Eurometropole Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai; 2. West-Vlaanderen/ Flandre-Dunkerque-Côte d’Opale. |
2 |
2 |
x |
2008 – ns |
Bulgaria |
Starting on EGTC |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 - open |
France |
Implementing regulation 1082/2006 on EGTC On 16th of April a law was adopted regulating the EGTC and harmonising it with the 2nd additional protocol of the Madrid Outline Convention. |
2 |
1 |
yes |
4/2008 - ns |
Hungary |
Implementation of the Hungarian Act on EGTC The framework prioritises informing the public and the local self-government units about the EGTC. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
8/2007 – open |
Italy |
Process of harmonization of national legislation and the EGTC |
2 |
- |
Yes |
Yes - 2010 |
Latvia |
Preparation of a law on EGTC To be adopted in the future. |
2 |
1 |
No |
ns |
Lithuania |
Law on the EGTC The law reduces the significant difficulties of implementing and managing actions of territorial co-operation. The law was adopted in 2008. |
2 |
2 |
- |
2008 - finished |
Luxembourg |
Implementing the EGTC Possibility of establishing EGTCs introduced. Implementation was expected to be concluded in April/May 2009. |
2/1 |
3 |
No |
End 2007 - finished |
Netherlands |
Implementation of the regulation 1082/2006 on EGTC |
4 |
2 |
Yes |
2006 – finished (2007) |
Slovakia |
Adoption of the Act No. 90/2008 on EGTC The Act came into effect on 1st May 2008 |
2 |
3 |
5/2008 |
|
Spain |
Authorisation procedures on EGTC |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
2007 - open |
Sweden |
Implementation of regulation 1082/2006 on EGTC |
3 |
1 |
Yes |
2006 - 2009 |
D. Transfrontier and Interterritorial Co-operation |
General challenge of transnational or trans-regional co-operation. |
IV.1. |
Frontline Issue of Change: Unspecified attempts of strengthening transfrontier co-operation |
||||
Country |
Details |
PI |
TC |
ILA |
Time frame |
Austria |
Developing relations and co-operation between the Austrian regions and the respective neighbouring regions. |
2 |
2 |
Yes |
Ns - ongoing |
Belgium – Brussels |
Continuing process of multilateral and bilateral co-operation |
2 |
1 |
- |
Since 1989 |
Netherlands |
Improvement of transfrontier co-operation between local and regional authorities The basic policy principle was formulated by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations in October 2006 and stresses the importance of provinces in directing and coordinating transfrontier co-operation in border areas. In accordance with the principle to decentralise where possible, and centralise where necessary, the central government stimulates and, if necessary, facilitates the seizing of opportunities and solving of bottlenecks in the border areas. |
3 |
2 |
Yes |
2000 - ongoing |
Switzerland |
Strengthening co-operation between authorities in conurbations covering two or more countries or cantons |
3 |
3 |
Yes |
ns |
Summary table Identified frontline issues by member state, allocated to the Budapest challenges and Budapest themes |
Legal Framework and Institutional Structure |
Democratic participation & public ethics |
|||||||||||||||||
I |
II |
III |
IV |
I |
II |
III |
IV |
||||||||||||
General and comprehensive reforms to advance decentralisation |
Modernisation of local and regional administration and service delivery |
Municipal reform – legal reform of the establishment of cities and villages |
Reform and restructuring at local level |
Reform at regional level |
Elections and legitimacy |
Central and Local Level |
Central and Regional Level |
Local and Regional Level |
Interregional level |
Inter-municipal co-operation |
New challenges |
Increasing citizen’s participation in the decision making process on local level |
New approaches: electoral participation |
Fight against corruption |
Creation and strengthening of Codes of Ethics |
Electoral turn out |
Participation of foreign residents at local level |
Gender and tolerance |
|
Albania |
|||||||||||||||||||
Armenia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Austria |
|||||||||||||||||||
Azerbaijan |
|||||||||||||||||||
Belgium – Brussels |
|||||||||||||||||||
Belgium – Flanders |
|||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
|||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic |
|||||||||||||||||||
Denmark |
|||||||||||||||||||
Estonia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
|||||||||||||||||||
France |
|||||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
|||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
|||||||||||||||||||
Latvia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Lithuania |
|||||||||||||||||||
Luxembourg |
|||||||||||||||||||
Malta |
|||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands |
|||||||||||||||||||
Norway |
|||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
|||||||||||||||||||
Romania |
|||||||||||||||||||
Serbia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Slovakia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
|||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
|||||||||||||||||||
Sweden |
|||||||||||||||||||
Switzerland |
|||||||||||||||||||
Turkey |
|||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
|||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
8 |
6 |
3 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
36 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
||||||||||||
46 |
38 |
Summary table Identified frontline issues by member state, allocated to the Budapest challenges and Budapes themes |
Local and Regional Finance and Public Services |
Transfrontier & Interterritorial |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
I - IV |
V |
I |
II |
III |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Financial decentralisation and deconcentration |
New financial instruments and non-fiscal sources of revenue |
Equalisation |
Reforms on finance & services |
Other reforms |
Reforming financing mechanisms |
E-government |
Extension of services |
Quality standards and efficiency |
Auditing |
Accountancy |
Defining the scope for risk taking |
Responding to the economic crisis and other emergencies |
Capacity Building using EU funding |
Agreements & international treaties |
Reform of national legislation |
Action under the EU structural funds |
Other |
Euroregions and the Madrid Outline Convention |
The Benelux Convention |
EGTC |
Unspecified attempts |
Total number of Measures |
|||
Albania |
3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Armenia |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austria |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Azerbaijan |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium – Brussels |
3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium – Flanders |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
13 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denmark |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estonia |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latvia |
3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lithuania |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luxembourg |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Malta |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands |
8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norway |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Romania |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serbia |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slovakia |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sweden |
7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Switzerland |
6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turkey |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
10 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
4 |
|||
43 |
4 |
1 |
10 |
22 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
47 |
33 |
164 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||